In the world of music licensing, the term "Royalty-Free Music" is frequently used, but often misunderstood. At its core, royalty-free music refers to a licensing model that allows a user to pay a one-time fee upfront for a license, and then use the music without paying any further fees for additional uses. This model stands in contrast to others, like the Needle Drop license, which requires payment every time the music is played publicly.
While the basic premise of royalty-free music seems straightforward, the term itself can be misleading. Here’s a closer look at how this model works and what it really means for musicians and producers.
What Exactly is Royalty-Free Music?
Royalty-free music, despite what the term might suggest, doesn’t necessarily mean that the music is completely free from all royalties. What it typically means is that the licensee—the person or entity licensing the music—will not be required to pay additional royalties or fees after the initial purchase. Once the license is obtained, the music can be used as specified in the agreement without further payments.
This licensing model is common in music libraries, which serve as marketplaces where music is made available for commercial use. These libraries often resemble the royalty-free model because they simplify the process of acquiring music for use in various projects, like TV shows, films, video games, or online content.
Where Things Get Cloudy
Despite its name, "royalty-free" music doesn’t mean the music is entirely exempt from all royalties—especially when it comes to public performance royalties.
Let’s break this down:
When music is used in public settings like television, radio, or live events, the broadcasters or organizations airing the music are still required to pay performance royalties. These royalties go to Performance Rights Organizations (PROs), like ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC in the U.S. These organizations collect royalties on behalf of the musicians when their music is played in public.
The good news for licensees is that they do not have to pay these royalties directly. Instead, broadcast networks (e.g., ABC, CBS) or other public venues are the ones who foot the bill. By law, these networks pay a blanket fee to PROs, who then distribute the royalties to the musicians based on cue sheets or performance data.
Here’s an example to clarify:
- Let’s say you’re producing a TV show for CBS and you license a track from a music library for use in your show. After you’ve paid the upfront fee to license the track, you’re done paying fees. Once your show airs, CBS will submit a cue sheet to the relevant PROs detailing which music was used. CBS already pays a blanket fee to the PRO, and that fee covers the royalties owed to the musician whose track you licensed. As the licensee, you don’t have to worry about any of this—CBS handles it.
The Misleading Sales Pitch
Unfortunately, some music libraries use the term "royalty-free" in a misleading way to attract customers. They may market their services by claiming that their music is "so royalty-free" that they don’t even allow PRO-registered music. This can create confusion and lead to the misconception that licensing PRO-registered music will result in hidden fees or additional costs.
In reality, this is a gimmick. The truth is that for most standard uses, licensing PRO-registered music is no different from licensing non-PRO music. YouTube videos won’t suddenly trigger copyright claims, and there won’t be any hidden fees down the road simply because a track is registered with a PRO.
In fact, most commercial uses of music, especially in film, television, and advertising, involve PRO-registered music. These registrations help ensure that musicians are fairly compensated when their work is used publicly. Excluding PRO music can limit the quality and range of music available in a library’s catalog.
Why PRO Registration Matters for Musicians
For musicians, being registered with a Performance Rights Organization is critical because it’s the only way they can collect performance royalties when their music is played publicly. Here’s how it works:
- A musician registers their music with a PRO.
- When the music is played on TV, radio, or in public venues, the broadcaster submits a cue sheet to the PRO, detailing which tracks were used.
- The broadcaster (e.g., CBS, NBC) pays a blanket fee to the PRO, which is distributed to the musicians as royalties.
If a musician isn’t registered with a PRO, they miss out on these royalties, even if their music is widely used on TV or radio.
Busting the Myths Around Royalty-Free Music
To summarize, here are some common myths about royalty-free music—and the truth behind them:
Myth: Licensing PRO-registered music will trigger YouTube copyright claims.
- Fact: PRO registration has nothing to do with YouTube copyright claims. YouTube’s Content ID system is separate and unrelated to PROs.
Myth: Licensing PRO music involves hidden fees or extra costs.
- Fact: Once you’ve paid the upfront sync license fee, you’re done. Any additional royalties are paid by broadcasters, not you.
Myth: Music that isn’t registered with a PRO is better or easier to use.
- Fact: Many high-quality tracks are registered with PROs. Avoiding PRO music can limit your options and may not result in better deals or ease of use.
Conclusion
While the term "royalty-free" music can be misleading, the essential takeaway is that it’s a model designed to make music licensing easier for the end user. As a licensee, you pay one upfront fee and can use the music according to the terms of the agreement without worrying about future payments. For musicians, being registered with a PRO ensures they are compensated fairly when their music is broadcast or played in public spaces.
Hopefully, this article clears up some of the confusion surrounding the royalty-free licensing model. Thanks for reading, and feel free to share, like, and comment below!
No comments:
Post a Comment