.png)
For music producers, composers, and sound designers researching whether Pond5 is still worth it, this review cuts through outdated hype and gives you the real, 2025 answer. Pond5 used to be the king of microstock for musicians. Then the market flooded, contributors piled in, royalties shifted, and AI transformed discovery. The question today isn’t “Is Pond5 good or bad?” — it’s how does Pond5 actually fit into a modern licensing strategy?
This article is a complete, honest, field-tested review based on years of contributor experience — including tens of thousands of licenses sold, PRO back-end royalties, direct buyer interactions, and the newer AI dataset revenue Pond5 introduced.
Is Pond5 Still Worth It for Selling Music?
Short answer: Yes — but not for the same reasons it used to be. Pond5 is no longer the easy money it once was, but it’s still one of the only marketplaces where musicians can:
- Set their own prices
- Upload unlimited tracks
- Sell both PRO and non-PRO music
- Earn AI dataset revenue (new)
- Operate fully non-exclusive
In 2025, Pond5 is valuable as a long-tail, volume-based income stream that also fuels PRO royalties and sync discovery — not as a platform that will make you rich quickly.
2025 Royalty Reality: Pond5 Pays Less Than Before
Pond5 once paid 50%. Then 40%. As of the latest structure:
- Music contributors earn 30% on individual sales.
- Exclusive higher rates apply only to video, not music.
This scares off newer composers — but veterans understand something important:
Visibility + catalog size matter more than royalty percentage.
A well-tagged Pond5 catalog of 500–1,000+ tracks can still generate:
- $200–$1,000/month in marketplace sales
- Plus PRO royalties from TV usage
- Plus the new AI dataset payouts
New in 2025: AI Dataset Royalties
This is the biggest change almost no one talks about.
Pond5 now pays contributors when their tracks are licensed into AI training datasets. These are opt-in and pay separately from normal sales. Reports from contributors show:
- Small catalogs: $50–$200
- Mid-size catalogs: $200–$1,000+
- Large catalogs: “better than their monthly sales”
Pros: Completely passive income, even for tracks that rarely sell.
Cons: Ethical debate — dataset training might accelerate automated music generation.
No matter what you think of AI, dataset income is now a real revenue source, and Pond5 is one of the few microstock sites offering it transparently.
Pond5 Pros
1. Artist-Controlled Pricing
You choose your pricing. Want your tracks at $29? $59? $199? It’s your call. Most marketplaces force standardized pricing — Pond5 doesn’t.
2. PRO Music Accepted (Huge Advantage)
Pond5 allows music registered with ASCAP, BMI, PRS, etc. Buyers don’t pay extra, and you still earn performance royalties when your track airs on TV or streaming platforms.
For pros, this is a non-negotiable feature.
3. Fast, Predictable Review Times
No multi-week bottlenecks like AudioJungle. Upload your music and it’s usually live within days.
4. Great Search Filters (When Keywording Is Done Right)
Buyers can filter by BPM, duration, genre, mood, price, upload date, and artist. This makes Pond5 ideal for musicians with well-organized catalogs.
5. Direct Customer Contact
Buyers can message you directly through your artist page, which often leads to:
- Custom scored projects
- Bulk licensing deals
- Repeat clients
This alone puts Pond5 above Shutterstock Music (dead) and AudioJungle (dying).
Pond5 Cons
1. Oversaturated Marketplace
Pond5’s catalog is massive. A new contributor uploading 20 tracks won’t see meaningful income without strategic keywording, niche targeting, and high output.
2. Weak Keyword Quality Control
Because contributors keyword manually, bad metadata floods search results. This hurts buyers and pushes good tracks deeper.
The solution: flawless keywording. (Your other article on keywording is the perfect internal link here.)
3. Lower Royalty Cuts Than the Old Days
Old contributors remember 50%. Today’s 30% stings — but it’s the market reality across all platforms, not just Pond5.
How Much Can You Actually Make on Pond5?
Realistic 2025 earnings ranges:
- 0–50 tracks: $0–$20/month (noise floor)
- 100–300 tracks: $20–$150/month
- 300–700 tracks: $100–$400/month
- 700–1,500 tracks: $300–$1,200/month
- 1,500+ tracks: depends entirely on niche + metadata
Genres outperforming in 2025 (based on marketplace observation):
- Future Bass
- Nu Metal & Hybrid Rock
- Ambient Drones
- Corporate Explainer Beds
- Minimal Underscore
- Dark Trap
These niches dominate commercial usage and stock video pairing.
Pond5 vs. Other Music Marketplaces
AudioJungle: Stricter approvals, lower earnings, inconsistent traffic. Good for beginners, but outdated.
PremiumBeat: Higher payouts, but fully exclusive and extremely difficult to get accepted.
MotionArray: Subscription model — income is stable but low per track.
Shutterstock Music: Essentially dead.
Pond5 wins on flexibility, pricing control, and PRO-friendliness.
Who Should Upload to Pond5?
Upload if:
- You have a high-volume catalog
- You produce consistently
- You want long-tail passive income
- You want PRO royalties from broadcast uses
- You want AI dataset revenue
Don't upload if:
- You expect overnight income
- You refuse to learn proper metadata
- You make only a handful of tracks a year
Final Verdict: Is Pond5 Worth It?
Rating: 8.5/10
Pond5 is still one of the best non-exclusive licensing marketplaces on the planet — not because it pays the most per sale, but because it still provides something rare:
Control.
You control pricing. You control metadata. You control catalog size. You keep your rights. You get PRO royalties. You now get AI dataset payouts. And you can walk away anytime.
For producers treating music as a long-term asset portfolio, Pond5 remains a foundational platform.
Want to test it yourself?